������������������������������� The Non History of The Blacks
The record of Blacks in South Africa, who have been ruling that country since their President DeKlerk betrayed his people, has been so appalling that even Mrs. DeKlerk, the wife of the treacherous deputy president, that she has been quoted as saying, "The Blacks are not capable of ruling a country." Which is demonstrably true, but the reason is not, as the liberals would claim, a lack of education or an unfavorable environment. It is purely and simply a matter of mental inadequacy.
As W.G. Simpson has pointed out in his book, "Which Way, Western Man?" the Negro has never developed a significant culture anywhere, at any time. Tom Anderson sums up Black history:
"Despite what you have been told, Negro history has not been obliterated. There wasn't any. During the past 5,000 years, THE HISTORY OF BLACK AFRICA IS BLANK. Not just here. Everywhere. Until other races arrived, THERE WAS NO LITERATE CIVILIZATION SOUTH OF THE SAHARA. THE BLACK AFRICAN HAD NOT INVENTED A PLOUGH; A WHEEL; DOMESTICATED AN ANIMAL; OR A CROP. HE HAD NO WRITTEN LANGUAGE; NO LITERATURE WHATEVER; NO NUMERALS OR CALENDAR; OR SYSTEM OF MEASUREMENTS."
The reason for this is purely biological and the proof has been given by scientists who have examined the brains of Africans and found that the supregranular layer of the frontal cortex is about 14% thinner than that of the White man. That is the area of the brain that is concerned with will, intellect, self-control and the capacity to maintain and create a civilization. It controls the ability to organize, plan and execute the elements that produce a stable government, a healthy economy and fiscal responsibility.
In has also been observed that when the Blacks are exposed to a higher culture over a period of time, they generally lagged behind the general level and their contributions have been few and of secondary order. Judging by the immediate results in the Republic of South Africa, we would say that the contribution of the Blacks has been decidedly retroactive.
In South Africa today the pressure to integrate the White with the Blacks is becoming more and more evident in their television programs. Letters from South Africa relate that it is customary to see beautiful blondes cuddling up to and killing the Blacks. Of course, race mixing has long been an obsession of the Jews and is promoted throughout the Western world, in their never ending efforts to destroy our Israelite people. Most of Europe and England are suffering along with America from this assault by the Jews and their colored hordes. The expected result of this general and official policy is mongrelization because a mongrelized population is easier to control.
In his book, Mr. Sparks claims that under Mandela's leadership, the ANC came to power without any outside help! He has the unmitigated gall to compare the ANC Blacks with the heroes of the American revolution in their struggle for independence. He praises the White and the Jewish collaborators as ardent patriots who lead a multi-cultural vanguard which will become an example of racial harmony for the rest of the African continent! It takes one's breath away, at the audacity of the man.
The question persists, however; How could a stable, prosperous and highly industrialized country such as South Africa vote itself voluntarily into Black rule? The answer is that it didn't. It was irresistible force from the outside that compelled its surrender. In South Africa the well-informed agree that this pressure came from the U.S. State Department. It can be added that the force behind that pressure was Jewish; it was allied by the same Jews who have penetrated every aspect of our lives during this century.
The two men chosen for this despicable job were Herman Cohen and Chester Crocker, with Henry Kissinger and Lord� Carrington; lurking in the background. Kissinger, Carrington and Crocker had been instrumental in turning the gallant little nation of Rhodesia over to Black Communist rule in 1980. Crocker had, behind his poncy, Foggy Bottom mustache, sneered at the murdered AWB men as they lay in pools of their own blood, calling them "barbecue commandoes."
He knows how close it had been, how his carefully laid plans could have come unstick if the Whites' planning had been just a little better in Bophuthatswana. His hatred for Whites is total. Chester Crocker is a caricature of our Jewish/homosexual; run Department of State. After Rhodesia, the South Africans knew what America wanted. America wanted South African Whites to die. The two massive military airfields in Botswana, the fortress of a U.S. embassy in Pretoria, CIA spies everywhere-added to the saturation bombing of Iraq (for what?) the message was clear.
The country itself had been softened up by two decades of Judaic demoralization in government and the church and the media. There was no other country to which South Africa could turn. It was made to appear pointless to resist. The masters of deceit had won again in a relatively bloodless takeover, if you discount the thousands of Africans who had been slaughtered. The once strong, brave Whites lost little blood but nevertheless voted for their own destruction.
Now it's our turn, will we Americans do the same thing? Maybe not, since there are so many more of us and among these great numbers are those who have learned from others' mistakes. Americans, too, are different from White South Africans in that we have become pretty disenchanted and cynical with regard to our government. And above all, Jews fear American opinion. The Jews know that if Americans ever turn on them it will be much worse for them than what actually happened to Jews during World War II, and we are not talking about the great HoloHoax, which is pure Jewish fantasy to allow them to steal billions of dollars from Germany.
We must go back in history to understand how this Jewish problem came about. Most Jews with whom we are confronted today are Ashkenazim. They or their parents or grandparents come not from Palestine but from Russia, Poland and Lithuania. They are not Semitic but rather Oriental. They were originally known as Khazars. The Khazars ruled a large kingdom in southern Russia in the eighth century. The Khazars were a mixed breed of Turk and nomadic Asiatic tribes, first appearing about the middle of the fifth century as a people under Hunnish sovereignty and were regarded, together with the Magyars and other tribes, as a later offspring of Attila's horde.
The Khazars were originally pagan and were confronted by the great Muslim onslaught as well as by the Eastern Roman Empire in Byzantium. They were pressured by both to convert to Islam and Christianity respectively and actually did both for brief periods before finally converting to Judaism around A.D. 70.
According to the Jewish version, the king summoned representatives of both the Roman Emperor and the Caliph of Baghdad and heard their arguments for conversion. The king had the inevitable Jewish advisor, who suggested ask the Christian, "Who is closer to your belief, the Jew or the Muslim?" (And of course the Christian knowing nothing of the Jewish religion) said, "The Jew."
He did the same with the Muslim, who also answered, "The Jew." The king then announced his kingdom's conversion to Judaism. This was believed to have been a neutralist, diplomatic maneuver! The Arab version is similar except the Muslim never got to answer the question. In this version, the Jewish advisor had the Muslim representative poisoned before he could see the King. (For a close look at this perplexing question of Jewish identity, see Arthur Koestler, "The Thirteenth Tribe," New York, 1976 and "Khazars," Encyclopedia Britannica).
The kingdom of Khazaria was almost all-powerful in its region north of the Caucasus Mountains, Between the Black Sea and Caspian Sea. Then Khazaria was defeated by the invading Varangians (Israelites), a Scandinavian people, and many of the Khazars fled westward. (The kingdom was finally erased by Genghis Khan's Golden Horde in the middle of the thirteenth century). The Jewish refugees from Khazaria settled mainly in what is now Poland and Lithuania. As a wandering tribe they found hospitality among the European nations and were welcomed in England. They became known simply as Jews, taken somewhat mistakenly from the tribe of Judah. They fit the self-absorbed, self-destructive identity of the Old Testament people but they are truly a Talmudic people from Western Asia.
The Jews soon became a hated people wherever they went and not only for their practice of usury. A persistent accusation in every country wherein they settled was that they had a ritual of slaughtering Christian children and draining their blood as an ingredient in their "religious" food. They were accused of deliberately poisoning wells with plague-infested corpses and thereby spreading the great Black Death in 1348-1350 which wiped out one-third to two-thirds of Europe's population. (They certainly did poison well during their Bolshevik seizure of power in Russia and their Zionist seizure of power in Palestine during World War II and the years following until 1948).
����� They were eventually expelled from every country in Europe, including England;� Except the United States and there is not much doubt that some day America will realize just how much the Jews despise and loth them; and they too will rise up and drive them out. Expulsions of Jews from Host Nations: 1). A.D. 250, Carthage; 2). 415, Alexandria; 3). 554, Diocese of Clement (France); 4). 561, Diocese of Uzzes (France); 5). 612, Visigoth Spain; 6). 642, Visigoth Empire; 7). 855, Italy; 8). 876, Sens; 9). 1012, Mayence; 10). 1181, France; 11). 1290, England; 12). 1306, France; 13). 1348, Switzerland; 14). 1349, Hielbronn (Germany); 15). 1349, Hungary; 16). 1388, Strasbourg; 17). 1394, Germany; 18). 1394, France; 19). 1422, Austria; 20). 1424, Fribourg & Zurich; 21). 1426, Cologne; 22). 1432, Savory; 23). 1438, Mainz; 24). 1439, Augsburg; 25). 1446, Bavaria; 26). 1453, Franconis; 27). 1453, Breslau; 28). 1454, Wurzburg; 29). 1485, Vincenza (Italy); 30). 1492, Spain; 31). 1495, Lithuania; 32). 1497, Portugal; 33). 1499, Germany; 34). 1514, Strasbourg; 35). 1519, Regensburg; 36). 1540, Naples; 37). 1542, Bohemia; 38). 1550, Genoa; 39). 1551, Bavaria; 40). 1555, Pesaro; 41). 1559, Austria; 42). 1561, Prague; 43). 1567, Wurzburg, Genoese Republic; 44). 1569, Papal States; 45). 1571, Brandenburg; 46). 1582, Netherlands; 47). 1593, Brandenburg, Austria; 48). 1597, Cremona, Pavia & Lodi; 49). 1614, Frankfort; 50). 1615, Worms; 51). 1619, Kiev; 52). 1649, Ukraine; 53). 1654, LittleRussia; 54). 1656, Lithuania; 55). 1669, Oran (North Africa); 56). 1670, Vienna; 57). 1712, Sandomir; 58). 1727, Russia; 59). 1738, Wurtemburg; 60). 1740, LittleRussia; 61). 1744, Bohemia; 62). 1744, Livonia; 63). 1745, Moravia; 64). 1753, Kovad (Lithuania); 65). 1761, Bordeaux; 66). 1772, Jews deported to the Pale of Settlement (Russia); 67). 1775, Warsaw; 68). 1789, Alace; 69). 1804, Villages in Russia; 70). 1808, Villages & Countrysides (Russia); 71). 1815, Lubeck & Bremen; 72). 1815, Franconia, Swabia & Bavaria; 73). 1820, Bremes; 74). 1843, Russian Border Austria & Prussia; 75). 1862, Area in the U.S. under Grant's Jurisdiction; 76). 1866, Galatz, Romania; 77). 1919, Bavaria (foreign born Jews); 78). 1938-45, Nazi Controlled Areas; 79). 1948, Arab Countries.
However, their ability to amass money, to manipulate loans to the warmongering leaders of the West who desperately needed funds for their adventures, brought them back into favor. The British were more obstinate but again, money prevailed when, in the sixteenth century, the Jews financed Cromwell on the conditions that the Jews who had eluded the mass deportation could stay and that more could move in.
Imperial Russia in 1792 confined most of her Jews, roughly five million of them, to an area stretching from Poland to Ukraine known as the Pale of Settlement. Approximately 200,000 privileged Jews were allowed to remain beyond the Pale.
The Diaspora (dispersed) Jews profited by their experiences until by the eighteenth century they were so well established that there was no longer, except in Russia, any danger of deportation. The Rothschild family, Amschel and his four sons, had prospered so mightily from their financial transactions with the needy governments, rulers and nobility that they could create revolutions and back both sides of the various political and religious wars that raged over Europe and England during that period.
The term "protocols" means in our discussion a draft of a plan of action by the Jewish leaders. There have been many such drafts at different periods in Jewish history since the dispersion, but few of them have gone into general circulation. One notorious example is the response to the chief rabbi of Spain by the Grand Sanhedrin in Constantinople in 1492, following the general expulsion of Jews by Ferdinand. The Grand Satraps and Rabbis issued (condensed) six-point protocol for Jews who wished to remain in Spain:
1). Convert to Christianity;
2). Become merchants and take the Christians' property from them;
3). Become doctors and apothecaries and kill Christians medically;
4). Become priests and destroy the Church from within;
5). Become lawyers, mix in affairs of State and by putting Christians under your yoke you may dominate the world and be avenged;
6). Do not swerve from this order and you will reach the actuality of power.
In the late eighteenth century a Jewish/Masonic blueprint for world government was discovered by the Bavarian police. This chance discovery led to the exposure and suppression of the Illuminati. Copies of these protocols were sent to Western Governments but were dismissed as extremist ravings. One wise American, Benjamin Franklin, working with his colleagues on framing the American Constitution, gave them a prophetic warning on the subject of the Jew.
His speech to the delegates at the convention was taken down by General Charles Pinckney, who kept a record of the speeches given by the delegates in his diary. This diary was on display at the Franklin Museum in Philadelphia until it mysteriously disappeared around the year 1900. However, Mr. G.L.K. Smith has a letter from Mrs. M. Dingley, who says that she and her mother saw the Pinckney diary in the museum and they copied Franklin's speech from it. This is the full text as published by Smith:
"For over 1700 years the Jews have been bewailing their sad fate in that they have been exiled form their homeland, as they call Palestine. But, gentlemen, did the world give it to them in fee simple they would find at once some cogent reason for not returning. Why? Because they are vampires and vampires cannot live on vampires. They cannot live only among themselves. They must subsist on Christians and other people not of their race.
�If you do not exclude them from these United States, in this Constitution, in less than 200 years they will have swarmed in such numbers that they will dominate and devour the land and change our form of government for which we Americans have shed our blood, given our lives, our substance, and jeopardized our liberty. 'If you do not exclude them in less than 200 years our descendants will be working in the fields to furnish them substance, while they will be in the counting houses rubbing their hands. I warn you, gentlemen, if you do not exclude the Jews for all time, your children will curse you in your graves.
�Jews, gentlemen, are Asiatics. Let them be where they will or how they will or how many generations they have been away from Asia, they will never otherwise. Their ideas do not conform to an American's, and will not even though they lie among us for ten generations. A leopard cannot change its spots. Jews are Asiatics, are a menace to this country if permitted entrance, and should be excluded by this Constitution.'"
The twenty-four protocols which concern us now were obtained in the French language from the Jewish Freemasonic "Mizraim" Lodge in Paris in 1884, translated into Russian and delivered to General Cherevin, the Russian Interior Minister. Cherevin suppressed the documents until his death in 1896, when they were included in his memoirs and willed to Nicholas II.
In 1897 Jewish members of the Russian police obtained the alleged minutes of the Zionist Congress in Basle, Switzerland, chaired by Dr. Theodore Herzl that year. These minutes were found to correspond with the French protocols. The Protocols as we know them are so terrible, so cruel and so convincing as to their origins that a reading of them creates fear and loathing of the obvious authors. Jewish spokesmen began immediately an attempt to discredit the documents as forgeries (forgeries of an original?) and then as a plagiarism of Maurice Joly's 1865 anti-Napoleon book, "Dialogues aux Enfers entre Machiavelli et Montesquieu. The Jewish spin doctors neglected to mention that Joly based his book on an 1850 book by Jacob Venedey entitled, "Machiavelli, Montesquieu & Rousseau." Joly and his Jewish friend, Venedey, were associated with Karl Marx, Adolphe Cremieux and other revolutionary Jewish Freemasons in the Alliance Israelite.
Both Joly's and Venedey's books can be traced to "The Prince by Machiavelli and L'Esprit des Lois" by Montesquieu. What difference does it make? If we were to conduct a campaign of resistance which was based on a novel such as "The Turner Diaries," the only thing that mattered would be the physical actions of that campaign. The fact that the campaign was based on the novel might be interesting-but only results count. The Protocols described not only results which the Jews had achieved up through the late nineteenth century but goals which they would accomplish twenty years later in Russia and then in Eastern and Central Europe. They also describe how Jews have seized control of life as we know it in the United States and the British Empire.
In Bolshevik Russia the penalty for "anti-Semitism" was death. Sergius Nilus, who originally published them in Russia in 1901, was arrested by the Bolsheviks, tortured and sent into internal exile where he died. To be in possession of the Protocols of Zion was to be shot on sight. This proves how revealing of the Jewish program are the Protocols, the program being an eventual world government with Jews in total power . To read them is to understand the enemy within.
The Jewish Question has been asked for centuries: Who is the Jew? How does he get into positions of power everywhere? Who puts him there? What does he do there? And there is also the great question of Jewish identity. Koestler certainly explodes the myth of the Khazar/Ashkenaz Jews being the "Chosen People" of the Old Testament. Thanks to him, the tern "anti-Semitism" has lost its meaning and power. (Willie Martin, has gone a step further and used Jewish writings to trace them back to Japeth the third son of Noah) The artificial state of Israel, ruled by Ashkenaz Jews from Poland and Russia, is not just a nation of parasites- it is a fraud. With American and British complicity it usurped Palestine from the Palestinians and has waged military and psychological warfare against its Semitic neighbors unceasingly for fifty years. Israel is anti-Semitic!
But there is yet another question which Koestler does not answer with regard to the amazing similarity between Sephardic Jews and Ashkenaz Jews, who are in no way related. The Sephardic Jews are those who migrated from Judea to Spain and lived there for more than a thousand years until most were expelled in 1492, and those who pretended to convert; the Marranos.
Look at Bernard M. Baruch, the Jew who seized control of the American economy during and after World War I and then during World War II and beyond. (The Jew Dwight Eisenhower, in his memoirs, remarked, "The smartest thing I ever did was ask Bernard Baruch for advice on my military career in 1939") Baruch was a Sephardic Jew. He was allowed first by someone and then by Congress to enrich himself while in government service almost beyond comprehension. He was an agent of the Sanhedrin which we see in the Old Testament, the New Testament, in Khazaria, Bavaria, the Southern Confederacy, right through to the office of every president, senator and congressman in this country's modern history.
The actions of Baruch the Sephardic Jew are identical to those of Kissinger the Ashkenaz which are identical to those of Judah Benjamin the Sephardic. These are in turn identical to those of the hundreds of Ashkenazim whom Clinton has appointed to the highest positions in his administration. The question remains: How could these strange people from Russia emulate; mimic exactly those same Edomite Jews who screamed, "Crucify him, crucify him!?" It is a puzzlement. They are linked by the Talmud, of course. This leads to the subjects of programming and reprogramming. If a Gentile can be programmed to be a Jew, can a Jew be reprogrammed to be a human being?
It is now 200 years since Franklin gave his prophetic warning and the Jews are in total control of our government and mass media. If someone doesn't believe this, there is a simple test: Try to find an article critical of Jews in any establishment outlet. Try to find a television documentary which shows how the Jews got "confessions" out of Germans in the Nuremberg Trials. Try to find a discussion on the TV talk shows about the numbers of Jews in Clinton's administration. Try to find a movie or television program or a novel which puts a Jew in the role of villain. Most fictional villains are blonde and blue-eyed.
As for our government, again, most of Clinton's appointees to high office are Jews and/or homosexuals such as Janet Reno, the lesbian who gave the orders to incinerate Christian men, women and children in Waco, Texas. Their guilt? They were "supposed" to be harboring illegal weapons, though none was found by the ADL-directed federal thugs who carried out the murderous assault. This was government terrorism inconceivable in the America we used to know. Yet that is not really true because in 1932 the following took place in Washington, D.C.
You say it can't happen here! Well it has already happened in America. The following article written by Neal Knox and published in Guns & Ammo Magazine, September 1989 issue, p. 32:
"It was clear that all the government had to do was wait. The multitudes of demonstrators in the immense government square had shrunk to a few thousand, and more were drifting away every day. But the hardliners were determined that the demonstrators shouldn't escape unscathed; such protests could lead to open rebellion and violent revolution‑like the one that had created the present government. With the heads of government divided and wavering, the Army decided to act. Obeying the orders of the president, the commanding general of the army lined up his forces facing the demonstrators and ordered them to disperse. The demonstrators didn't think the Army would attack. It did. Tanks rolled into and across the demonstrators' ramshackle huts. Marching soldiers with fixed bayonets and assault rifles and tear gas followed the tanks, clubbing, bayoneting and shooting those assembled.
�The Army later said the demonstrators rioted; the general claimed armed soldiers were attacked. Many of the demonstrators were wounded; the number who died will never be known ‑ the government claimed it was only one. The commanding general declared that the demonstrators were driven by 'the essence of revolution,' and that it was 'beyond the shadow of a doubt' that the demonstrators had been about to seize control of the government.
�The commander was Gen. Douglas MacArthur.
�The place was Washington, D.C., not Beijing.
�The date was 1932, not 2001.
�The 'assault rifles' were bolt‑action Springfield Model 1903s, not AK‑47s. The peaceful demonstrators weren't students in Tiananmen Square demanding the equivalent of our First Amendment rights of freedom of speech, freedom of assembly and the right to petition the government for grievances. The demonstrators on the Washington mall and nearby Anacostia already had those rights; their problem was that they used them. They were Americans ‑ World War I veterans, thrown out of work by the Great Depression (created by the Federal Reserve), lobbying for government to immediately pay their promised Veteran's Bonus.
�No, the attack on the Bonus Marchers, bad as it was, wasn't the brutal mass murder unleashed upon the students in Beijing. The American people wouldn't have tolerated it ‑ and had the means to stop it. What happened at Tiananmen Square was the kind of ruthless tyranny that has occurred in other lands throughout history, and is precisely what the Founding Fathers feared might be done by the powerful central government they were creating under the United States Constitution. That's why the people refused to ratify that Constitution until it was amended to guarantee certain individual freedoms known today as the Bill of Rights.
�That's why the First Amendment guarantees of speech, assembly and petitioning the government were backed up by the Second Amendment guarantee that the right of the people to keep and bear arms was not to be infringed. And when, during debate on the amendment, some senators attempted to limit the right to apply only to 'the common defense' which is what some people today say it is, the Senate rejected it. That piece of 'legislative history' clearly shows that the Second Amendment was intended to be an individual right; not merely a 'collective right' of states to have militia. But don't tell me it can't happen here ‑‑ because it has already happened here!"
Reno labeled them a dangerous religious cult that abused children. Reno burned the children to keep them from being abused, and we now know that the abuse charges were fabricated. CBS News reported through a "Sunday Morning" producer named Bernstein that thanks to modern computers it is now possible to interpolate segments of the tattered Dead Sea Scrolls.
It is also now possible to interpret other obscured writings, such as those on a fifteen-inch pear, shaped stone obelisk found in Jordan. This has resulted in a "bombshell," according to the Bernstein report. Until now it was believed that "Moloch" was an ancient, evil Hebrew god who demanded the sacrifice of children by burning them. The computer-aided translation has revealed that "Moloch" was Not a Hebrew god but was rather the Hebrew word for the Hebrew practice of sacrificing their first-born children for "religious reasons." The Jews interviewed by CBS were concerned that among other things, the story of the Passover must be re-examined.
The Davidian sect's real crime was that they had been falsely flying the Star of David and converting Jews to their form of Christianity. The citizens of Waco found the members to be peaceful and cooperative. The Judaic cult to which Janet Reno pays allegiance exhorts its members to leave nothing alive following a successful attack on an enemy. Is this an ancient, outdated command, no longer in vogue? What abut Eisenhower's conduct of World War II and its aftermath? The deliberate starvation of 1 million German solders, and operation Keelhaul which sent thousands of Polish, Russian, and other citizens back to Russia to be burned in cattle cars, and sent to Siberia for slave labor. What about the attack by the Jews on Deir Yassin, Palestine? They left nothing alive that breathed, all the dogs, cats, pigs, goats, cattle; everything breathing was killed! That was in 1948. That was when the Palestinians fled Palestine. They recognized the Talmudic exhortation, and that they could expect no help from the English or the Americans.
The same Judaic FBI killer team that burned the Waco church and its members were fresh from another Talmudic operation in Idaho. First the family dog and little boy were shot and killed form behind by U.S. marshals who were directed by Jewish government psychiatrists. Then professional FBI assassin were brought in to finish the job. All adults were to be shot by the assassin, one of which was the mother holding her nursing infant daughter. She died quickly with a bullet through the head. The men were lucky to survive their wounds.
Their crime? They believed in apartheid, the separation from the Judaized America. The husband had sold two shotguns with barrels technically shorter than "the law" allows. For this the whole family was slated for death by bullets and/or fire. The death squad attempted to drop Diesel fuel from a helicopter and incinerate them in their remote mountain cabin but there were just too many witnesses. The husband was eventually acquitted in a multi-million dollar federal trial and awarded over three million dollars for his troubles.
If, two or three generations ago, one had tried to tell this true story of Randy Weaver they would have been taken to the nearest asylum. The stark truth is that we are not the same people we were two or three generations ago. We are a wishywashy, unthinking herd of sheep that sit in front of our television sets and watch people shoot each other and blow up buildings and cars in beautiful clouds of flame and smoke or we listen to solemn pundits earnestly discussing the present situation but carefully avoiding the fact. The Jews call us goyim; cattle. We're the cows and they're the cowboys. Our main interests seem to be our jobs, our investments and our plans for retirement usually in a remote area well away from the rat race that earning a living has become these days.
Americans are about to join South Africa and other victim nations in the New World Order, or Jewish World Government. What it amounts to is the brutally dictatorial money oligarchy run by Jews and the aggregations of capital invested in multi-national companies and oil interests.
Preparations have already been made to deal with potential dissidents, along the lines of Waco and those measures employed by Israelis against Palestinians. The only thing that stands between us and them is the emergence of the militia movement made up of men who are grimly determined to resist our ultimate Judaization. Many of them don't even k ow whom they are resisting! Many of these brave men would be shocked to find that they are preparing to fight the forces of a dreadful future at the behest of Almighty God against such as that which has engulfed South Africa, guided by a frightening document known as the Protocols of the Meeting of the Learned Elders of Zion.
The Jewish enemy can be defeated. First, fall on your knees and cry out to God for forgiveness of your sins, repent and seek Him in all your actions, and be Baptized for the remission of your sins, and then read the Protocols. Second speak out and inform others. Remain calm but understand the gravity of our situation and make others understand it, too. Third, always think in terms of victory over evil rather than in terms of defeat. The Jews wage psychological warfare and that depends on our ignorance of their goals. Study the Protocols and the Jews will be disarmed. As long as we are knowledgeable, alert, worship God in truth and righteousness, remain alert and mentally tough, we cannot be defeated for God will save us.